Create the VAP device with:
wlanconfig ath0 create wlandev wifi0 wlanmode ahdemo
Ahdemo mode is handy for long shot point to point connections as you avoid the RTT and inefficiency of the control packets in BSS/IBSS mode.
The pseudo ad-hoc mode (Pseudo-IBSS mode, 'lucent ad-hoc demo' mode, PIM) is a pre-standards, pre-IBSS ad-hoc mode without beaconing ( no management frames at all: no beacons, no association, no probes, just data), which means that all the nodes in the mesh need to have channel assigned manually and won't hop channels. This will give you slightly better throughput than regular ad-hoc mode because it doesn't bother with the beaconing/probe response packets. But since beaconing is ignored you don't know the capabilities of the other nodes (like WME).
With ahdemo mode you can get rid of beacon synchronization and IBSS merging (coalescing) problems in an easy way, especially in situations where you don't actually need the "beaconing features" of IBSS, like for non-interoperable mesh solutions, for example.
Adhoc demo is not ibss. There is no 'standard' for "adhoc demo" "pseudo-ibss" mode, MadWifi implements it as "ibss minus beacons"
At least with old Lucent cards, pseudo adhoc mode did not use auth/assoc at all, it just started using IBSS (BSSID=00:00:00:00:00:00) immediately.
1. The BSSID will be all zeros.
2. There is no distributed beaconing mechanism
3. As long as the cards on the same channel and within the radio range, all the cards can hear each other. There is no separate cells at the link layer.
4. A card in PIM will not send out any management frames (Probe request/response, beacon, authentication, deauthentication, ATIM, association request/response, reassociation request/response, disassociation)
5. What is the impact on the nearby 802.11 IBSS communication? Ubder testing 802.11 IBSS won in getting bandwidth. Running flood ping on both connections, 802.11 IBSS retry on corrupted packets gained, after a short time, all of bandwidth and pseudo IBSS connection had lost it. So you will need clear channel or very strong signal or send very small packets.
6. There are no Control frames (except the ACK frames).
7. The two cards in PIM set up the communication like classic cable Ethernet? Messages are broadcast to the current channel and the IP layer decide whether it should "receive" the data.
8. Packets are sent at rate you set. One needs to set the same rate on every card.
Mar 09 01:35:38 mattbrown It's working really well btw.
Jun 15 18:33:16 foobarian i get 27Mbps with UDP when I use cwmin=5
Jun 15 18:34:20 ignuss got over 35mbit UDP and 33mbit TCP without turbo in 5ghz band , well, signal has been perfect
Jun 15 18:34:32 foobarian but when i use cwmin=1 i get 41Mbps
Jun 15 18:43:53 foobarian i think you would run iwpriv ath0 cwmin 0 1 <desired_cwmin>
Ago 01 2007 20:10:48 soulhunter This is great!, improved my throughput from around 100kB/s to around 250 ~ 300kB/s. (10 miles link).